Container element for a text link to a related journal article, possibly accompanied by a very brief description of the object (such as “errata”)
Where Used. This element has several uses:
How Related. Whether used in the metadata or within the text, the @related-article-type attribute can be used to name the relationship. Examples are given in the list below. (See the @related-article-type for more complete relationship information.)
Not Used For. The introduction to a special issue or special section is not typically tagged as a related article. Neither is related article used to indicate informal groupings of articles on the same topic.
(#PCDATA | ext-link | related-article | inline-supplementary-material | bold | italic | monospace | overline | roman | sans-serif | sc | strike | underline | alternatives | inline-graphic | article-title | source | trans-title | target | xref | sub | sup)*
Any combination of:
<related-article> used in the article metadata to point from an erratum to the original articles.
... <article-meta> ... <permissions copyright-status="active"> <copyright-statement>Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association</copyright-statement> <copyright-year>2007</copyright-year> <copyright-holder>American Psychological Association</copyright-holder> </permissions> <related-article related-article-type="correction-target" doi="10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1431"> <article-title>Relation Availability Was Not Confounded With Familiarity or Plausibility in Gagné and Shoben (1997): Comment on Wisniewski and Murphy (2005)</article-title> </related-article> <related-article related-article-type="correction-target" doi="10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.459"> <article-title>Postscript</article-title> </related-article> ... </article-meta> ...
<related-article> used in the article metadata to cross-link an article and a commentary on the article.
... <article-meta> ... <permissions copyright-status="active"> <copyright-statement>Copyright 2006 by the American Psychological Association</copyright-statement> <copyright-year>2006</copyright-year> <copyright-holder>American Psychological Association</copyright-holder> </permissions> <related-article related-article-type="original-article" doi="10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.169"> <article-title>Frequency of Relation Type As a Determinant of Conceptual Combination: A Reanalysis</article-title> </related-article> <related-article related-article-type="commentary" doi="10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1431"> <article-title>Relation Availability Was Not Confounded With Familiarity or Plausibility in Gagné and Shoben (1997): Comment on Wisniewski and Murphy (2005)</article-title> </related-article> ... </article-meta> ...
<related-article> used in a figure caption to point to an erratum
...
<fig id="fig2">
<label>2</label>
<caption>
<p align="left">Raw mean change per item over time on Psychosocial Distress outcomes.
BSI = Brief Symptom Inventory; PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder; SAS = Social Adjustment
Scale—Self-Report</p></caption>
<p align="left">
<related-article related-article-type="correction-flag" doi="10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.566"/>
</p>
<graphic copyright="inherit" id="fig2a" xlink:href="ccp_72_6_1063_fig2a.tif" xlink:type="simple"/>
</fig>...
common3.ent